Critically Assess the View That Natural Law Is of No Use When Discussing Sexual Ethics Essay

I believe that born(p) law is of no use when discussing get offual moral philosophy as it is very vague and doesnt breath into account specific situations. immanent equity says that every liaison has a purpose, and that mankind was made by divinity fudge with a specific design or objective in mind. It says that this purpose toilette be known by reason. As a result, fulfilling the purpose of our design is the except peachy for valet. The Primary Precepts of Natural righteousness nurse us to live in an ordered golf club to reproduce, to educate our young, to protect the sp ar and the to the highest degree important to worship divinity.The more or less relevant of these in this subject is reproduction, and if you look at it as a duty to continue the re-population of gods people than of course sex can be understood as a good and moral action. In fact there are many biblic references to sex and Gods opinion on it, in Genesis He says be fruitful and affix in number and through-out it shows that sex is necessary. The problem for a Natural Law supporter comes when sex is save code as an efficient guinea pig, e. g. or merriment and enjoyment, this is non following Gods terminal cause of re-production.Contraception is seen as basal in Natural law and for close to Catholics. If contraception is use it splits the efficient practice of sex from the net cause of reproduction this goes against that actions purpose and makes it wrong as not what God intend. However some Natural Law supporters would argue that sex is not roughly what humans gain from it but what God actu tout ensembley intended it to be about, which could be unity and love etceteraOther philosophers/philosophies who argue that this way of idea about contraception and sex can lead to situations of spare suffering. For example, a utilitarian approach would assess how put out and pleasure can be maximised in a situation and so would probably sharply seam with Natural Law. An other thing to consider when thinking about natural law and contraception is that they dont take into account third world countries, for example, and how not using contraception go away lead to a spreading of aids and children the parents cant afford to give a good life. quirk is another sexual deal that Natural Law calls immoral for the same reason as contraception, because it doesnt fill in sexs final cause and reproduction and so homosexual sex cannot produce any children it is not ethical. The Catholic church service has long supported this view and have stated that homosexual orientation is not in itself immoral but just like the infertile check sex without the possibility of children makes it wrong.However another thing to consider as part of the living in an ordered society precept is not cosmos judgmental of other people. Pre- marital sex could be seen as either good or bad by natural law followers as if the pair off is reproducing and being good nurturing parents the n theyre fulfilling most of the primary precepts and that is good. However they arent fulfilling the main one, worshiping God, as the bible teaches that sex should be saved for marriage, so a lot of natural law followers would say it is wrong.Something to consider in this is if theyre actually planning to get married at all? Does it still count as pre-marital? Extra marital sex is also a contentious issue for Natural Law followers. In a marriage ceremony promises are made before God to love and to cherish and most importantly desertion all others to stay married until death do us part. As a denunciation before God, this cannot be broken and still be part of the primary precept worship God.The last-ditch aim of life is to be united with God through our moral actions, as society where crime and deception are accepted is not a place where God is being worshipped effectively. provoke should be about reproduction and families and therefore manner of speaking you closer to God not a rapine of a sacred vow. To conclude, I would argue that Natural law is an overly harsh method of devising ethical decisions. It does not take into account the most loving action for people and nor does he make any exception for circumstance or what will benefit the majority of people.